A lot has happened since Dr. Nosheen Hasan was first was reprimanded in 2016 for her negligent and harmful practices. She regained full licensure later that year. However, more continued to come out on Dr. Hasan's financially motivated way of running her Center for Pain Management.
As stated by the Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services (DSPS): On April 25, 2019, the United States intervened in a civil complaint in united States District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin (Court), Case Number 17CV 1796, against Respondent alleging that she received illegal "kickbacks" for the exclusive referral of patients to a specific drug testing laboratory (Laboratory) between 2012 and 2017."....."The United States further alleged that, as part of the alleged laboratory referral scheme, Respondent ordered urine drug tests that were neither medically necessary nor performed as billed as they were performed at the Laboratory but billed by Respondent. The Untied States contended that this resulted in Respondent retaining an unearned portion of third party reimbursement."
Dr. Hasan was able to enter into a settlement agreement and pay the United States $1.35 million (plus interest) in restitution. As reported, "This settlement did not constitute an admission of wrongdoing by Respondent."
Dr. Hasan continues to see patients, despite another example of her pattern of treating patients through care that isn't medically necessary and often for financial gain.
As stated by the Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services (DSPS): On April 25, 2019, the United States intervened in a civil complaint in united States District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin (Court), Case Number 17CV 1796, against Respondent alleging that she received illegal "kickbacks" for the exclusive referral of patients to a specific drug testing laboratory (Laboratory) between 2012 and 2017."....."The United States further alleged that, as part of the alleged laboratory referral scheme, Respondent ordered urine drug tests that were neither medically necessary nor performed as billed as they were performed at the Laboratory but billed by Respondent. The Untied States contended that this resulted in Respondent retaining an unearned portion of third party reimbursement."
Dr. Hasan was able to enter into a settlement agreement and pay the United States $1.35 million (plus interest) in restitution. As reported, "This settlement did not constitute an admission of wrongdoing by Respondent."
Dr. Hasan continues to see patients, despite another example of her pattern of treating patients through care that isn't medically necessary and often for financial gain.